Why are native English speakers so bad at spelling their own language?
Just  check this site about British students and all the mistakes they make:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1042425/Why-ignore-bad-spelling-Lecturer-calls-amnesty-students-20-errors.html?ITO=1490  Americans  are even worse. Why does that happen? What do you think about that  phenomenon?  Here are some comments from non-native English speakers, and I agree  with them:  Paula, Italy: I am a foreigner, I studied your beautiful, elegant,  expressive language as a foreign language, and I don't make spelling  mistakes. Most of my friends and colleagues who also studied it as a  foreign language don't make any spelling mistakes either. We're not an  educated elite, we studied English in very average, ordinary schools, no  more than three or four hours a week. How come British "students"  cannot manage?  Eve, Poland: This idea is ridiculous. Besides, I don't understand how  people can make such mistakes in their own language. English is my  second language and I wouldn't be caught dead misspelling these words.  CC7, Switzerland: I'm not a native English speaker and yet I would write  all the words in this list correctly. That's called "learning", and it  should also -especially- go for native speakers!  Wilma, Netherlands: My Dutch students were extremely surprised when I  told them that lots of English people could not distinguish between  "there" and 'their" and "it's" and 'its". By the way English is my third language.  Raymond, Germany: I am a language trainer in Luxembourg and to give in  to the bad spellers is a capitulation which signals how little respect  British people have for their own language. German, French and even  Polish speakers don't suffer similar problems because they are taught to  hold their language in high regard. (...) I tell my international  language training participants to ask Scandinavians or Dutch people how  to write if I am not there to help. Furthermore, I know one British  person at the place I work whose letters are corrected by his French  boss because they are full of mistakes.  Anthony, Malta: I learnt the English Language at a state school in Malta  fifty years ago. Thankfully great emphasis was laid on this most  important of languages then and now. Spelling mistakes were anathema.  How can people, born and bred in England, be unable to spell words in  their own language ? How low can standards in this once Great country  get ?    I mean really, how did those people get accepted in the university in  the first place, if they don't know how to spell? I'm shocked, just like  other non-native English speakers, and don't understand how someone can  be unable to spell their own language - especially university students. To Vangorn: You're wrong, it's not true that in all other languages one  letter always represents one sound. French spelling seems even more  irregular than English to me, in Greek you have 5 ways to write the "i"  sound, etc. But those people care about their language. And if  foreigners can take effort to learn English properly, so should native  speakers. To Pinguino: I agree that English spelling is more difficult than  Italian, but they also don't seem to care enough. There are some rules  in English too, but many people don't follow them. Some of them don't  know some really easy things, like apostrophes for example.  To Martina: Read it again. I didn't say that Maltese people are native  English speakers; quite the opposite.  To Bla Bla: I didn't say that all of them are bad spellers, but I have  noticed myself that many native English speakers tend to be sloppy when  it comes to their language. It seems like they don't consider the  language important enough and it may also be because they don't learn  foreign languages. Most Europeans I have talked to could speak at least 1  foreign language or even more, and their English was pretty good. On  the other hand, many Americans, Canadians, Australians and even British  had problems spelling their own language correctly. 
Other - Education - 8 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Because our Brains cant SpellCheck!! ^_^  And parents are becoming really lazy when it comes to teaching their kids phonics... Teachers can only do so much!  
2 :
I don't know why this is, but it drives me crazy.   I attribute the problem to a few main things: People do not READ  anymore, so they're not used to seeing things spelled properly. The  other problem is there is not enough emphasis on spelling in school.  With the advent of the Internet and spell-check, people have become  really lazy about it. My kids have teachers who can't spell, and the  schools don't even care!  I have worked in newspapers for many years. Most of the new college  graduates who are taking reporting and copy-editing jobs also cannot  spell (and don't know proper grammar or punctuation, either). These are  people who were English/Journalism majors in college!   The problem is rampant. I see misspellings in national and local  advertisements every single day.   If those who write and teach English for a living cannot spell, I give  up. Sometimes I think I'm the only person left who cares about proper  English. It's lonely.
3 :
People can't spell in English  because the language makes no sense with letters vs. pronunciation.  In  almost all other languages, writing a certain letter ALWAYS represents a  certain sound.  But in English, what sounds go with which letters are  so varied and mixed up and there are so many variations that it's hard  to keep them all straight, not strait.  Consider, for instance:  Rough, cough, bough, through all end in "ough" but you say all of them  differently.  Then all the "c" sounds:  Cat, City, Chomp, Eschew.  And even words that look the same can be pronounced differently or have  different meanings.  Buffet to pummel, Buffet a food spread, Bow and arrow, take a bow Live long and prosper, Live at Hollywood Lead on general, Lead poisoning polish the furniture, Polish sausage The soldier decided to desert in the desert before dessert.  There are just so many damn (dam?) things that don't make any sense  (cents?) in English.  It's so hard to stay on track (not the train  track, the thought track).  See? (C?)
4 :
I remember Wizard Magazine reported the same,  years ago :) Even more, they were surprised how foreign readers writing to them were  used to use a far more correct English language than English native  speakers from home (the US). I think the reason basically is foreign people tend to learn a sort of  "official English" (that's what any school or course is supposed to do);  an American person lives inside an English speaking society where the  daily language is "bastardized", so they get used to talk that way. Foreign students who study English outside of an English speaking  country are somehow "protected" by that.  As for your reply to Vangom: the difference between a phonetic and a  non-phonetic language is in a phonetic language there always are very  specific rules about how to spell letters or group or letters; so it's  true in a phonetic language you may face the same letter spelled  differently or different letters spelt the same way, but all this IS  regulated by rules: for instance in Italian "c" sound is English "ch"  when followed by "i" or "e" while have English "k" when followed by a,  o, u or h; so there "c" sound have the same spell as "q" sound, but  there's no way an Italian speaker can spell "c" the wrong way, since we  can follow a rule.  Now in English, for instance, can you tell me according to which rule  the "oo" sound in "room" and "door" are completely different...?      
5 :
I  truly must agree with Vangom2's and Pinguino's answers here. Apart from  the things that had already been said, I've always been wondering for  what reason "ea", like in "steal" and "ee", like in "weep" sound the  same. In my opinion, only the pair of two "e" letters should be regarder  as the long "ee" sound and "ea" should be regarded the same way it is  in the "wear" word.  Moreover, the varieties of reading "a" is also surprising. Compare, for  instance:  1. Bar. 2. Cat. 3. Wander.  It's hard to show the difference here, in writing, but everyone who  knows English knows what I'm talking about.  And as to the "writing" word - could someone explain to me how come the  "t" letter isn't doubled, when (according to the rule) the "e" letter is  crossed out when adding "-ing" and "i", as a vowel is positionized  between two consonants, because personally I don't get it?  Lat but not least: Why "every day" is written separately, when  "everyone" and "everybody" is written being compound? This is also the  thing that makes me wonder  P.S. I'm native Polish
6 :
Just to inform you about  something.THE MALTESE PEOPLE'S MOTHER TONGUE LANGUAGE IS NOT ENGLISH.IT  IS OUR BEAUTIFUL LANGUAGE-MALTESE.  SO WE DON'T CARE IF WE SPELL NOT CORRECT ENGLISH SINCE IT IS NOT OUR  LANGUAGE.  THIS IS AN OFFENSE!!  IF THEY DON'T MAKE US LEARN IT,WE WOULDN'T EVEN BOTHER LEARN IT!!  ALSO WE ARE NOT ENGLISH NEITHER BRITISH OR WHATEVER.WE HAVE PURE BLOOD  MALTESE.((THANKS GOD!!!))
7 :
yes, we speak maltese in  malta. we are not english. our national language is maltese, we are  bilingual and we speak english with foreigners but not between us.  however english education is very high and i am proud of saying that we  have a high quality of language education. most of us are not only  bilingual but also multilingual! 
8 :
Whilst I often read  and highly respect your answers, I have to say that this question is a  bit of a sweeping generalisation to say that all native English speakers  are bad in spelling  At least in my generation (30's) at University you most definitely had  to be able to spell, and this was even having to submit reports on the  PC  Naturally with the advent of computerised documents, it is almost second  nature to rely on spell-checks and grammar checks (which of course are  not 100 percent fool-proof).  However from my peer group at least 95  percent consistently write English correctly including "their"  "there's"!!  P.S. - The Daily Mail is a tabloid paper and wonderful at  sensationalising information and putting things into a different  context.  It has been found guilty of liable more times than I can count  and also have more editors than I have had hot dinners.  Therefore  personally I do not consider it a very reliable source of accurate info
Read more other entries :